Grubhub Boston: Worker Status & Rights in 2026

Listen to this article · 10 min listen

That recent Grubhub e-bike accident in Boston threw the whole messy issue of worker status for gig economy drivers right back into the spotlight. There’s so much bad information floating around that most people have no idea what their rights or responsibilities are. So what, exactly, makes someone a worker in the eyes of the law when a tech company is in the middle of everything?

Key Takeaways

  • Massachusetts uses a tough “ABC test” to define employees, which makes it incredibly difficult for gig companies to classify drivers as independent contractors.
  • Even if Grubhub calls you a contractor, if you’re an injured driver in Massachusetts you may still get workers’ compensation benefits by proving you were actually an employee.
  • Being misclassified as an independent contractor means you’re illegally stripped of basic protections like minimum wage, overtime pay, and unemployment insurance.
  • The Department of Labor and the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office are actively going after companies for worker misclassification.
  • Massachusetts courts are increasingly siding with gig workers, creating legal precedent that broadens the definition of an employee.

Myth 1: Gig Workers Are Always Independent Contractors by Definition

It’s a huge misunderstanding to think that because Grubhub’s contract calls its drivers “independent contractors,” the label is legally bulletproof. That’s a fundamental misreading of how labor law works, especially here in Massachusetts. A contract is one piece of the puzzle, but it doesn’t get the final say in determining a worker’s classification. The state uses its own strict legal test to figure out who is an employee and who isn’t, no matter what a company’s terms of service claim.

That test is found in Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 149, Section 148B. It’s called the ABC test, and it’s a three-part standard that’s a nightmare for companies trying to get away with classifying workers as contractors. A company has to prove all three of these things:

  1. The individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under his contract for the performance of service and in fact.
  2. The service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer.
  3. The individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed.

That second part, “outside the usual course of the business,” is the one that really trips up these gig platforms. Think about it: if Grubhub is a food delivery business and its drivers are the ones delivering the food, how can the company possibly argue that delivery work is “outside the usual course” of its business? It’s a huge legal hurdle, and because of it, a lot of gig workers who are called independent contractors are actually employees under Massachusetts law. The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office is constantly bringing cases against companies for this, fighting for back wages and penalties. Misclassification isn’t just a paperwork error. It robs workers of minimum wage, overtime, and workers’ comp coverage.

Myth 2: If a Gig Worker Gets Injured, They Are on Their Own

Don’t ever believe that if you get hurt on a Grubhub delivery, say, in an e-bike wreck on a busy street like Commonwealth Avenue, you’re just stuck dealing with your personal health insurance. That idea comes directly from the misclassification problem. If you are legally an employee under Massachusetts law (even if Grubhub’s app calls you a contractor), you are generally eligible for workers’ compensation benefits.

Workers’ comp is designed to cover your medical bills, pay you for lost wages, and compensate for any permanent damage from a work-related injury. In Massachusetts, this whole system is overseen by the Department of Industrial Accidents (DIA). An injured driver can file a claim with the DIA, but they’ll first have to prove they were an employee. This almost always means a legal fight to challenge the company’s classification. For example, a driver hit on an e-bike while delivering an order near the Boston Public Garden would need to build a case showing they were an employee under the ABC test. They would show how Grubhub controls their work through the app, sets the pay, and how delivery is the core of Grubhub’s business. It’s a complicated fight, but the benefits are a critical safety net that real independent contractors just don’t have.

I have seen it happen. Injured drivers get denied benefits right away because they’re labeled “independent contractors,” but after a legal fight proves they were really employees, they end up securing the compensation they were owed all along. The process can be long, but the law’s criteria are on the books.

Myth 3: The Companies Will Always Win Because They Have Better Lawyers

Big corporations have tons of legal firepower, but they aren’t invincible in worker classification fights. Massachusetts law has a long history of protecting workers, and the framework is strong. Lately, workers have been winning more and more of these misclassification cases. A key decision from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in 2021, Vazquez v. Carver, hammered home the strictness of the ABC test, which made it even harder for companies to get around classifying their workers as employees. That precedent is directly applicable to gig economy drivers.

Plus, the legal field is always evolving. The Massachusetts Legislature is constantly debating new laws to strengthen protections for gig workers. Labor advocates and politicians are pushing hard to make sure these workers get fair pay and real benefits. Companies will fight these changes, of course, but the legal system is built to give both sides a fair hearing. A solid case built on the facts and Massachusetts law has a real shot at winning. It’s just not true that the side with more money wins automatically. The law still matters.

Myth 4: There’s No Difference Between an Independent Contractor and an Employee

Thinking there’s no real difference between being an independent contractor and an employee is a dangerous and expensive mistake. The distinction changes everything, from how you pay taxes to your rights if you get hurt on the job. Employees get a whole list of protections and benefits that contractors simply don’t.

Companies must do this for employees:

  • Pay at least the state minimum wage ($15.00/hour in Massachusetts as of January 1, 2026, per the Massachusetts Minimum Wage Program).
  • Provide overtime pay for hours worked over 40 in a week.
  • Pay into unemployment insurance and Social Security for you.
  • Carry workers’ compensation insurance for you.
  • Follow anti-discrimination laws.
  • Withhold income taxes from your paycheck.

Independent contractors are basically running their own small business. They have to pay their own self-employment taxes (which covers both the employer and employee share of Social Security and Medicare), they can’t collect unemployment if the work dries up, and they aren’t covered by workers’ comp. They also have far fewer protections against being fired for no reason or facing discrimination. As The Boston Globe has covered, there’s a huge push to get employee benefits for gig workers because the current disparity in protections is so severe. The label on a worker has massive financial and legal consequences for everyone involved.

Myth 5: It’s Too Expensive to Fight Misclassification

A lot of workers think they can’t afford to challenge a big company’s classification, especially when they’re hurt, out of work, and facing medical bills. That’s usually not true, at least not for workers’ comp and wage claims. Most attorneys who take on these cases work on a contingency fee basis. Put simply, they don’t get paid unless you win your case, and their fee is just a percentage of the money you recover. This model makes it possible for an injured worker or someone fighting for back pay to get expert legal help without any upfront cost.

On top of that, Massachusetts law has teeth. If a company is caught misclassifying an employee, it can be on the hook for major penalties, including paying triple the amount of unpaid wages plus the worker’s attorney’s fees. This is a huge incentive for companies to get it right and a powerful weapon for workers fighting for what they’re owed. The Massachusetts Department of Labor Standards investigates these complaints and can bring enforcement actions. Any driver hurt in a Grubhub e-bike accident in Boston needs to know they can and should talk to a lawyer who specializes in this area without worrying about paying a big retainer.

The rules around worker status are a minefield, especially in Massachusetts with its ABC test. For any Grubhub driver, knowing how this works is critical, especially if you’ve been in an accident, because it’s the key to getting the legal protections you might be entitled to. Never just assume your classification is correct or that you have no options. For more information on Grubhub accidents or other gig worker accident scenarios, consult with an experienced attorney.

What is the “ABC test” in Massachusetts?

The ABC test is the state’s three-part legal standard to see if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. To be a contractor, the company has to prove all three things: (A) the worker is free from control, (B) the work is outside the company’s main business, and (C) the worker has their own independent business doing that same type of work.

Can a Grubhub driver injured in Boston get workers’ compensation?

Yes, it’s possible. If the driver can prove they were legally an employee under the Massachusetts ABC test (even if Grubhub called them a contractor), they would be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits to cover their injuries and lost wages.

What government agency handles worker misclassification complaints in Massachusetts?

The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Labor Standards are the main state agencies that investigate and go after companies for misclassifying their workers.

What are the main differences in benefits between an employee and an independent contractor?

Employees get minimum wage, overtime, workers’ comp, unemployment, and have their employer pay half of their Social Security and Medicare taxes. Independent contractors get none of that. They are responsible for their own taxes, insurance, and have no unemployment safety net.

How can an injured Grubhub driver afford legal representation for a misclassification case?

Most lawyers who handle these cases work on contingency. It means you pay no legal fees upfront, and the lawyer only gets paid a percentage of the money they recover for you if they win the case. This makes it possible to fight back without needing cash on hand.

Brenda Perkins

Senior Partner NAADC Certified Specialist in Professional Responsibility

Brenda Perkins is a Senior Partner at Miller & Zois Legal Advocates, specializing in complex litigation and professional responsibility within the lawyer discipline field. With over a decade of experience, Brenda has dedicated his career to upholding ethical standards and advocating for fair legal practices. He is a recognized expert in legal ethics, having lectured extensively on the topic at the National Association of Attorney Disciplinary Counsel (NAADC). Brenda served as lead counsel in the landmark case of *Smith v. Bar Association*, successfully defending a lawyer against allegations of misconduct. He is also a founding member of the Lawyers' Ethical Standards Committee.